Zionist-Controlled Media Somehow Unable To Control Israel Coverage

“I would never have assumed the Jewish media overlords would permit such things to happen. But here we are,” said UN adviser Richard Falk.

New York, May 7 – Analysts at the United Nations held a meeting today to discuss the curious phenomenon of the Zionist-controlled international media somehow being unable to prevent the media from indulging in nearly continuous criticism of Israel.

A team of experts met at the UN headquarters in New York this morning (Friday) to share information and analysis regarding an industry proven to be thoroughly under the boot of Jewish moguls. Jewish control of the media, which has been documented for more than a century – notably in he groundbreaking Russian work The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion –  has been spectacularly unsuccessful at the one task a Jewish-controlled global media should be expected to focus on: silencing exposure and criticism of its flagship enterprise, Zionism. In fact Israel attracts such a disproportionate amount of opprobrium in the Jewish-controlled media that an observer might conclude no such control exists at all.

In fact, say experts, in the Middle East, the one region where the Zionist-controlled global media should be most necessary and effective, there appears to be no effort at all to counter the blatantly anti-Israel, and often antisemitic, tropes that are a staple in Arabic and Farsi media. “It’s quite surprising to note the frequency and intensity of anti-Israel, anti-Jewish ideas and sentiments in Arab media – I would never have assumed the Jewish media overlords would permit such things to happen. But here we are,” said UN adviser Richard Falk.

The analysts remain divided over what accounts for the seemingly plentiful criticism of Israel across all types of media. The most widely held assumption involves an intentional policy on the part of the Jewish media barons to maintain the appearance of an independent free press, when in fact behind the scenes the mix of stories and opinions is carefully calibrated. “The Economist, of all publications, was allowed to claim that [Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin] Netanyahu’s office exercises final approval over all articles in the daily Israel HaYom paper, and refused to retract the assertion despite no evidence to support it, and despite denials from both the paper and Netanyahu,” noted Falk. “To me, that was a masterstroke – using the very subject of Zionist media control to undermine its veracity.”

Others put the emphasis not on the appearance per se of an independent media, but on the exploitation of the media to create the image of an Israel beset by antagonistic journalists, as a vehicle to generate international sympathy, especially among conservatives already suspicious of the largely liberal media establishment. “It actually amazes me how far the script takes many journalists and organizations as they pretend to be anti-Israel,” said radio host Alex Jones, who for some reason is still on the air and unmolested. “I’d have thought the Zionist overlords would show more subtlety, and not have Israel’s opponents look so over-the-top hateful that it’s not convincing. But people seem to buy it, so Zuckerberg, Eisner, Adelson, Sulzberger, and company obviously know something I don’t.”

“I mean, beyond everything else they’re simply keeping hidden from us to keep us under control like sheep,” he added for clarity.