Study: Death Penalty Primitive Ritual Unless Imposed By Muslims

An as-yet-unidentified chemical or environmental factor evidently makes the same phenomenon in Arab or Muslim societies far less objectionable.

Hebron, January 9 – Research by a team of scientists testing the status of capital punishment has determined unequivocally that under most circumstances, the application of the death penalty constitutes an indicator of irredeemable barbarism, unless the system under which the penalty is administered is run by Arabs or Muslims. In such a case, say the scientists, capital punishment is chemically transformed into at most an offense of lesser egregiousness than the sale of land to a Jew.

A study in the monthly journal Humanist Yobs Pretending Objectivity on Civil Rights, Israel, Terrorism, and Equality (HYPOCRITE) observed the scientific status of the death penalty in various societies in recent decades, and determined that when Western authorities mete out the penalty, they are to be denounced as violating human rights. However, an as-yet-unidentified chemical or environmental factor evidently makes the same phenomenon in Arab or Muslim societies far less objectionable, as indicated by the level of funding and attention its opposition attracts. In fact, say the scientists, the unknown factor or factors appears to make some non-Western applications of capital punishment either a necessary evil or a noble act of defense against imperialism or other destructive forces.

The HYPOCRITE researchers looked specifically at the application of capital punishment in the United States, where rigorous academics have confirmed the brutality, primitiveness, and questionable morality of the policy, and then compared the same academic sources’ reaction to the same phenomenon in the Arab and Muslim worlds. In terms of the latter, the same scholars, who obviously bring scientific and academic rigor to everything they do, describe Arab-Muslim capital punishment in terms that range from lack of culpability born of not being Western to outright praiseworthiness of zealously defending the rule of laws that protect the population from the predatory activities of non-Arabs or non-Muslims.

Thus, in Florida, Kansas, Texas, and Missouri, for example, the practice of putting criminals to death can be safely and scientifically criticized as a policy that unjustly deprives humans of life when other, more fitting penal options exist. By contrast, in the Palestinian Territories, for instance, where selling land to Jews is punishable by torture and death, the article notes that it is scientifically preferable to inform on a seller of land to Jews, a penalty that carries a capital sentence under Palestinian law, than to refrain from such informing. The difference, say the study authors, lies in the non-Western use of the death penalty for such offenses. Whereas in a Western context such a law would be both a violation of morality for the mere application of capital punishment, and a manifestation of anti-Jewish racism so stark that it cries out to be condemned, in its current context it has been scientifically proven to be necessary, just, and stop focusing on this already Occupation Occupation Occupation Apartheid.