Study: Banning Burkhas OK As Long As Anyone But Israel Does It

One of the key prerequisites for improper discrimination to be defined as such, according to objective international standards, is that it be perpetrated by Jews.

Cannes, August 15 – New scientific research has confirmed a long-suspected hypothesis according to which discriminatory policies against Muslims are acceptable in places such as France, Russia, and elsewhere, but when Israel implements such measures, that automatically constitutes Apartheid and a violation of human rights.

Researchers conducted a meta-analysis of studies from the last ten years, and published their results in the journal Proceedings of the Royal European Journal of Ubiquitous Demonstrations of Israel’s Criminal Existence (PREJUDICE). The PREJUDICE scholars looked at the contrast between, for example, French municipalities banning Burkini swimwear popular almost exclusively among Muslims and Israel taking measures to prevent Palestinian attackers from harming Israelis.

The PREJUDICE articles notes that when Israel takes measures such as building a wall to keep attackers away, or imposing security checkpoints to detect or deter would-be attackers, the human rights community, which is known for its scientific objectivity, rightly calls out Israel for discriminatory treatment. The international community, in the form of various United Nations agencies and councils, pursues, or at least endorses, steps to punish or denounce Israel for those behaviors.

In contrast, such measures are out of place when various French towns effectively bar Muslims from beaches and public pools, since those instances do not, objectively, constitute improper discrimination against Muslims. The PREJUDICE authors note that one of the key prerequisites for improper discrimination to be defined as such, according to objective international standards, is that it be perpetrated by Jews.

Lead author Sayyid Ensso of the University of Ankara explained that while many people see the Jews as controlling France, it would not be correct to see French and Israeli discrimination policies as measurable on the same scale. “You can’t blame France for French policies if it’s not really the French who run France, but the Je – I mean, the Zionists,” he said. “You can’t honestly take people to task for doing things when they’re under someone else’s control, even if they don’t know it.”

Ensso used the same approach to give context to lukewarm, nonexistent, or qualified condemnation of Palestinian violence. “It’s those Zionists,” he explained. “Because Palestinians by definition lack volition, since they are the ultimate victims, they cannot be properly blamed for the so-called crimes they commit. It all comes down to their behavior all resulting from the Occupation – except the good things, which obviously demonstrate the righteousness of Palestinian society despite the hardships imposed by the Zionists and have nothing to do with them.”